Decoding Iran’s
'resistance economy'
Summary:
Iran’s economic plan is
to build domestic capacity to reduce Iran’s vulnerabilities to sanctions and
external shocks.
Re Edited by: KANWAL ABIDI * Journalist and Political
Analyst
Posted February 24,
2014
In a decree issued
Feb. 19, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei introduced the
general policies of Iran’s “resistance economy.” The following are some of the key
objectives presented in this document:
·
Domestic capacity
building with maximal utilization of the country’s resources, with a special
focus on the participation of lower and middle-income classes in wealth
generation
·
Promotion of a
knowledge-based economy through drafting and implementing a comprehensive,
scientific plan for the country and promoting innovation with the ultimate goal
of becoming the No. 1 knowledge-based economy of the region
·
Increased efficiency in
economic activity, improvement of economic competitiveness
·
Utilization of subsidy
reforms to optimize energy consumption in the country, increase employment and
domestic production and promote social justice
·
Improve Total Factor
Productivity based on the
empowerment of domestic human resources through skills education
·
Promotion of domestic
production, especially in strategic products and services and the consequent
reduction of dependence on imports
·
Provision of food and
medicine security
·
Consumption management
based on the promotion of consumption of local products parallel to the
qualitative improvement of domestic production
·
Comprehensive reform of
the financial system to respond to the country’s needs
·
Targeted promotion of
exportable goods and services through legal and administrative reform as
well as the promotion of foreign investment for export purposes
·
Increase the economy’s
resistance through regional and international economic collaboration,
especially with neighbors but also through diplomacy
·
Reduce vulnerability of
oil and gas exports through the selection of strategic buyers
and involving the private sector in diversifying sales channels
·
Increase oil and gas
value-added exports
·
Increase oil and gas strategic
reserves and production to have an impact on international markets
·
Implement reforms to
rationalize government costs, increase tax revenues and reduce dependency on
oil and gas export revenue
·
Increase the share of
the National Development Fund from oil and gas export revenues
·
Increase transparency in
financial matters and avoid activities that pave the way for corruption
President Hassan Rouhani immediately reacted to Khamenei's decree and
clarified tasks for a number of government institutions on how to plan and
implement the needed policies. As is common in Iran’s governmental
affairs, a number of committees and task forces have been established to follow
up on the actions needed to achieve the above objectives.
Some analysts see the
issuance of the decree as a reminder by the supreme leader that the positive
outlook for nuclear negotiations should not derail the country’s overall effort
to reduce its vulnerability to external sanctions. Indeed, a number of
powerful stakeholders in Iran believe that sanctions generated an opportunity
to become more focused and more efficient. As such, one can understand the
timing and content of this initiative as a push not to allow the Iranian
industry and government to fall back into a mentality of imports and maintain
the momentum that has been generated through sanctions.
It is true that the term
“economy of resistance” emerged as an Iranian response to the Western sanctions
regime, and it is also valid that some of the above objectives are designed
to strengthen the Iranian economy against external pressure. However,
the majority of the above goals had already been defined in the country’s 20-Year Prospective Document (also known as Vision 2025), which had
been passed and also decreed by Khamenei in 2005. Vision 2025 called on
the Iranian government to pave the way for Iran to become a
knowledge-based economy and the region’s top economic and technological power
by 2025.
What may have compelled
Khamenei to issue a new decree is the reality that the administration of
former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was relatively indifferent to the
objectives stated in Vision 2025. Partly due to misguided policies and
partly due to external sanctions, Iran deviated far from the original
goals. Some experts argue that returning to the level of economic balance
of the pre-Ahmadinejad era alone will take years. Essentially, the decree
should be seen as a top-level endorsement of the new government’s focus on
comprehensive economic reform.
Incidentally, both in
the original 2005 document and also in this recent decree, most of the stated
objectives could also be part of an economic liberalization program. There
are very few goals and reform objectives that are unique to Iran’s specific
ideological context. However, the Islamic Republic of Iran has always
focused on its unique literature, and “resistance economy” is a term to
characterize the Iranian response to Western sanctions policies. A closer
look at the proposed reform agenda underlines the regime’s desire to improve
economic conditions, reduce vulnerabilities and promote competitive advantages
— all areas that were neglected in the Ahmadinejad years.
No matter how we term
these policies, the essence has been and remains domestic
capacity building. The Iranian economy has the potential
to move from its current below-average performance to becoming a
developed economy. It has all the resources (natural, human and
geostrategic) that an economy would need to play a much more significant role
on the international stage. The missing links are in the areas of responsible
and accountable policymaking, legal transparency and modern
institutions. The above decree addresses most of these issues, but it
remains to be seen whether it is feasible to achieve these objectives within
the country’s current political structure. The fact remains that key Iranian
stakeholders tend to over-politicize economic and institutional processes,
making it impossible to implement efficient reforms. One such example can
be seen in the subsidy reforms that have yet to produce the intended results
(i.e., better distribution of income) for the Iranian economy. As such, the
Rouhani administration should use this opportunity to create or redefine some
institutions (such as the independence of the Central Bank) that could improve
the country’s economic conditions beyond its own term.
The decree on the
“resistance economy” should be seen as a new attempt by the top leadership of
the Islamic Republic to provide the contours of Iran’s economic
doctrine. It continues to be torn between liberal economic principles and
an Islamic ideology that is seeking its own justification in key policy
areas. For example, its reference to a “jihadi culture of wealth
generation, entrepreneurship, etc.” is a reminder of this ideological
slant. However, as long as the objectives of economic empowerment and
development are achieved, Iranians and the country’s business community
will not mind what the policy is called.
No comments:
Post a Comment